The Department of Investigation of the Crime in the Judicial Process has decided to review the deceptive verdict against the convicted Irakli Diasamidze.
On this case, a re-, complete and objective investigation was conducted, new witnesses were identified and questioned, dozens of investigations and trial actions were conducted, expertise, investigative and court case materials were studied, new evidence was obtained, based on which the investigation obtained a combination of false evidence that ruled out any kind of and by Irakli Diasamidze The fact of committing a crime.
Irakli Diasamidze has been charged with violating the rules of safety and operation of transport traffic, which caused less serious and serious injuries to the victims’ health, a crime under Article 276 and 3 of the Criminal Code of Georgia.
Irakli Diasamidze, by the decision of July 18, 2011, of the Batumi City Court, was convicted under the first and third sections of Article 276 of the Criminal Code of Georgia and was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment, a fine of 3000 GEL, and 18 months imprisonment for the right to drive a vehicle.
He was detained in the courtroom. On September 13, 2011, the Court of Appeal of Kutaisi approved a trial agreement, according to which Irakli Diasamidze was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment, which was provided with a condition of 4 years probation, according to articles 63 and 64 of the Criminal Code of Georgia, as well as an additional punishment a fine of 3000 GEL and deducted from transport The right to drive the vehicle for 6 months.
In the re-investigation process, complex-commissioned medical, autotechnical, and autotrasological expertise were conducted on the case, during which detailed questions were asked to answer the expertise, which were not examined in the investigation process of convictions.
It has been established with complete autotechnical expertise that Irakli Diasamidze did not commit a crime provided for under Article 276 of the Criminal Code of Georgia, and his action was not causally connected with the result, which led to the prosecutor’s office violating his right in the process of criminal justice. About to go. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s office addresses the Kutaisi Court of Appeal to intervene in the review of the deceptive verdict against Irakli Diasamidze due to the newly revealed circumstances.
